Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Am Coll Health ; : 1-11, 2023 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2293651

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) pandemic on Residents Assistants (RA) at a public university in the Midwest. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-seven RAs that had been offered an RA position for the '20-'21 academic year. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey measuring socio-demographics, stress, and well-being was fielded. MANCOVA models evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on well-being of Current RAs and compared to the non-current RA groups. RESULTS: Sixty-seven RAs provided valid data. Overall, 47% of RAs had moderate-severe anxiety and 86.3% had moderate-high level of stress. Current RAs perceiving a great impact of COVID on life had significantly more stress, anxiety, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress than those who did not. RAs who started then quit experienced significantly higher secondary trauma compared to Current RAs. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to better understand the experiences and of RAs and to develop policies and programs to support RAs.

3.
Prev Med ; 139: 106229, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-695150

ABSTRACT

First recognized in December 2019, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19) was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. To date, the most utilized definition of 'most at risk' for COVID19 morbidity and mortality has focused on biological susceptibility to the virus. This paper argues that this dominant biomedical definition has neglected the 'fundamental social causes' of disease, constraining the effectiveness of prevention and mitigation measures; and exacerbating COVID19 morbidity and mortality for population groups living in marginalizing circumstances. It is clear - even at this early stage of the pandemic - that inequitable social conditions lead to both more infections and worse outcomes. Expanding the definition of 'most at risk' to include social factors is critical to implementing equitable interventions and saving lives. Prioritizing populations with social conditions is necessary for more effective control of the epidemic in its next phase; and should become standard in the planning for, and prevention and mitigation of all health conditions. Reversing disparities and health inequities is only possible through an expansion of our 'most-at-risk' definition to also include social factors.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Health Status Disparities , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Social Determinants of Health , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL